Decision of the „Bundesverwaltungsgericht“, 26.06.2015, GZl. W113 2013215-1

Wind power station „Bäröfen“, Carinthia. Clarification of the term “project” as defined by the “Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfungsgesetz 2000”

Decision of the „Landesverwaltungsgericht Kärnten“, 11.02.2015, GZl. KLVwG-3150/2/2014

Wind power station, Carinthia. Cassation of the „Landesverwaltungsgericht Kärnten“ due to missing evaluations.

Decision of the „Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol“, 11.12.2014, GZl. LVwG-2014/41/0891-12

Forest road, Tyrol. A contemporary alpine farming must be considered in the balancing of interests.

Decision of the „Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol“, 17.10.2014, GZl. LVwG-2014/35/2419-3

Military off-field landings in the national park „Hohe Tauern“. The case was closed, because the flights have not been conducted.

Decision of the „Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol“, 23.03.2015, GZl. LVwG-2014/26/3081-7

Cable lift Zillertal, Tyrol. The court declared no objections to the Alpine convention.

Decision of the „Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol“, 26.01.2015, GZl. LVwG-2014/44/2472-6

Agricultural terrain correction. In a natural legal process the declaration of consent from the landowner is no license condition.

Decision of the „Umweltsenat“, 03.12.2004, GZl. US 5B/2004/11-18

Red Bull GmbH, Motorsport centre, Spielberg, Styria. The submitted project does not comply with the applicable approval criteria.

Decision of the „Umweltsenat“, 08.03.2007, GZl. US 9B/2005/8-431

This decision concerns the construction of a 380 kV-power line in Styria. The Alpine Convention does not apply to the affected area.

Decision of the „Umweltsenat“, 12.06.2012, GZl. US 4B/2011/16-85

Ski area expansion Hochsonnberg, Salzburg. According to § 3a NSchG, the project cannot be approved.

Decision of the „Umweltsenat“, 13.10.2008, GZl. US 6A/2007/16-24

Amelioration measures in alpine pastures in the ski region Gerlospass Königsleiten-Hochkrimml, Salzburg. The „Umweltsenat“ had no doubts concerning the implementation of § 3 Abs. 2 and §3a Abs. 6 UVP-G 2000 in accordance with EU-directives.

Decision of the „Umweltsenat“, 14.01.2011, GZl. US 3B/2010/12-23

Wind power station „Pischelsdorf“, Götzendorf, lower Austria. The administrative decision for the wind power station was not grant.

Decision of the „Umweltsenat“, 17.04.2009, GZl. US 5A/2008/24-19

Alpenpark “Turracher Höhe, Styria. The administrative decision for the “Alpenpark” was illegitimate.

Decision of the „Umweltsenat“, 17.09.2008, GZl. US 3B/2007/7-16

Combined cycle power plant, Carinthia. The decision concerns the question whether the municipality “Magdalensberg” has legal standing.

Decision of the „Umweltsenat“, 20.12.2007, GZl. US 7B/2007/5-33

Amelioration measures in alpine pastures in the ski region Gerlospass Königsleiten-Hochkrimml, Salzburg. The „Umweltsenat“ had no doubts concerning the implementation of § 3 Abs. 2 and §3a Abs. 6 UVP-G 2000 in accordance with EU-directives.

Decision of the „Umweltsenat“, 26.04.2007, GZl. US 6B/2007/2-18

Ski area expansion “Schafkögel”, Hinterstoder, upper Austria. The Umweltsenat did not respond to the Alpine Convention.

Decision of the „Umweltsenat“, 27.11.2008, GZl. US 4A/2008/11-59

Seepark hotel, Carinthia. The Umweltsenat did not respond to the Alpine Convention.

Decision of the „Verwaltungsgerichtshof“, 18.10.2012, GZl. 2010/04/0086

Block stone extraction, Tyrol. In this case, the court must not examine the relevant protocols of the Alpine Convention.

Decision of the „Verwaltungsgerichtshof“, 26.03.2007, GZl. 2003/10/0080

Construction and operation of the S 18 Bodensee highway, Vorarlberg. It is the duty of the federal government, to determine the course of a federal highway.

Decision of the „Verwaltungsgerichtshof“, 29.01.2007, GZl. 2003/10/0081

Construction and operation of the S 18 Bodensee highway, Vorarlberg. It is the duty of the federal government, to determine the course of a federal highway.